Market, valuation, underwriting — start to finish.市场、估值、投资测算——一条链走完

Prism turns a single address into valuation, comparable sales, and local context — across residential and commercial. Two tools are live today; the rest are on the way. Prism 把一个地址变成估值、可比成交与本地情况 —— 覆盖住宅与商业地产。两个工具已经上线,其余的正在路上。

Southern California, one market at a time. 南加州,一个市场接一个市场地看。

146 cities, 2010–2025. Press play to watch them change. 146 个城市,2010–2025。按播放看它们怎么变。
· today's values (growth is 2010 → the selected year) · 当前值(增幅为 2010 → 所选年份)
Growth since 2010较 2010 增长
Median income收入中位数
Payment / income月供占收入
Cheapest vs dearest quarter最买得起 vs 最买不起

Across Southern California cities, the quarter that was cheapest to buy into grew fastest: median population since , against for the most expensive quarter. 南加州 个城市里,最买得起的那四分之一增长最快: 年以来人口中位 ,而最买不起的四分之一是

Association, not cause. Inland cities are both cheaper and have land to build on, and that alone would produce the same pattern. Ranked correlation −0.37 against current affordability; −0.54 against 2010 price levels, which precede the growth they are compared with. 这是相关,不是因果。内陆城市既便宜、又有地可盖,光这一条就能产生同样的形态。与当前可负担的秩相关是 −0.37;与 2010 年房价(在增长之前)的秩相关是 −0.54。

2025 City population, 2010–2025 — 城市人口 2010–2025 ——
Population vs 2010 (each county indexed to 100) 相对 2010 年的人口(每个郡以 100 为基准)

Size = population · Ring = gaining (green) / losing (red) people · Color = affordability vs the regional median (greener = cheaper than most, redder = pricier) 大小 = 人口 · 圆环 = 人口在涨(绿)/ 在缩(红)· 颜色 = 相对全区中位的可负担度(越绿=比多数便宜,越红=更贵)

The numbers above compare cities with each other. Both paths below go inside a single market. 以上的数字是城市之间的比较。下面两条路是走进其中一个市场。

Source: SGS Market Database · as of 2025 来源:SGS Market Database · 截至 2025

Live — ready to use已上线 —— 现在就能用

Background reading: Los Angeles CRE — a $1 trillion market at a crossroads, on the population and affordability numbers behind this map. 延伸阅读:洛杉矶商业地产 —— 万亿美元市场的十字路口,讲的是这张地图背后的人口与可负担数字。